Amahury J. López-Díaz, Pedro Juan Rivera Torres, Gerardo L. Febres, Carlos Gershenson

Discrete dynamical models underpin systems biology, but we still lack substrate-agnostic diagnostics for when such models can sustain genuinely open-ended evolution (OEE): the continual production of novel phenotypes rather than eventual settling. We introduce a simple, model-independent metric, {\Omega}, that quantifies OEE as the residence-time-weighted contribution of each attractor’s cycle length across the sequence of attractors realized over time. {\Omega} is zero for single-attractor dynamics and grows with the number and persistence of distinct cyclic phenotypes, separating enduring innovation from transient noise. Using Random Boolean Networks (RBNs) as a unifying testbed, we compare classical Boolean dynamics with biologically motivated non-classical mechanisms (probabilistic context switching, annealed rule mutation, paraconsistent logic, modal necessary/possible gating, and quantum-inspired superposition/entanglement) under homogeneous and heterogeneous updating schemes. Our results support the view that undecidability-adjacent, state-dependent mechanisms — implemented as contextual switching, conditional necessity/possibility, controlled contradictions, or correlated branching — are enabling conditions for sustained novelty. At the end of our manuscript we outline a practical extension of {\Omega} to continuous/hybrid state spaces, positioning {\Omega} as a portable benchmark for OEE in discrete biological modeling and a guide for engineering evolvable synthetic circuits.

Read the full article at: arxiv.org

• Papers