Month: December 2023

The unequal effects of the health–economy trade-off during the COVID-19 pandemic

Marco Pangallo, Alberto Aleta, R. Maria del Rio-Chanona, Anton Pichler, David Martín-Corral, Matteo Chinazzi, François Lafond, Marco Ajelli, Esteban Moro, Yamir Moreno, Alessandro Vespignani & J. Doyne Farmer
Nature Human Behaviour (2023)

Despite the global impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the question of whether mandated interventions have similar economic and public health effects as spontaneous behavioural change remains unresolved. Addressing this question, and understanding differential effects across socioeconomic groups, requires building quantitative and fine-grained mechanistic models. Here we introduce a data-driven, granular, agent-based model that simulates epidemic and economic outcomes across industries, occupations and income levels. We validate the model by reproducing key outcomes of the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 in the New York metropolitan area. The key mechanism coupling the epidemic and economic modules is the reduction in consumption due to fear of infection. In counterfactual experiments, we show that a similar trade-off between epidemic and economic outcomes exists both when individuals change their behaviour due to fear of infection and when non-pharmaceutical interventions are imposed. Low-income workers, who perform in-person occupations in customer-facing industries, face the strongest trade-off.

Read the full article at: www.nature.com

Why birds are smart

Onur Güntürkün, Roland Pusch, Jonas Rose

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Many cognitive neuroscientists believe that both a large brain and an isocortex are
crucial for complex cognition. Yet corvids and parrots possess non-cortical brains
of just 1–25 g, and these birds exhibit cognitive abilities comparable with those
of great apes such as chimpanzees, which have brains of about 400 g. This opinion
explores how this cognitive equivalence is possible. We propose four features that
may be required for complex cognition: a large number of associative pallial neurons,
a prefrontal cortex (PFC)-like area, a dense dopaminergic innervation of association
areas, and dynamic neurophysiological fundaments for working memory. These four neural
features have convergently evolved and may therefore represent ‘hard to replace’ mechanisms
enabling complex cognition.

Read the full article at: www.cell.com

Models of Cell Processes are Far from the Edge of Chaos

Kyu Hyong Park, Felipe Xavier Costa, Luis M. Rocha, Réka Albert, and Jordan C. Rozum

PRX Life 1, 023009 – Published 15 December 2023

Complex living systems are thought to exist at the “edge of chaos” separating the ordered dynamics of robust function from the disordered dynamics of rapid environmental adaptation. Here, a deeper inspection of 72 experimentally supported discrete dynamical models of cell processes reveals previously unobserved order on long time scales, suggesting greater rigidity in these systems than was previously conjectured. We find that propagation of internal perturbations is transient in most cases, and that even when large perturbation cascades persist, their phenotypic effects are often minimal. Moreover, we find evidence that stochasticity and desynchronization can lead to increased recovery from regulatory perturbation cascades. Our analysis relies on new measures that quantify the tendency of perturbations to spread through a discrete dynamical system. Computing these measures was not feasible using current methodology; thus, we developed a multipurpose CUDA-based simulation tool, which we have made available as the open-source Python library cubewalkers. Based on novel measures and simulations, our results suggest that—contrary to current theory—cell processes are ordered and far from the edge of chaos.

Read the full article at: link.aps.org

Understanding political divisiveness using online participation data from the 2022 French and Brazilian presidential elections | Nature Human Behaviour

Carlos Navarrete, Mariana Macedo, Rachael Colley, Jingling Zhang, Nicole Ferrada, Maria Eduarda Mello, Rodrigo Lira, Carmelo Bastos-Filho, Umberto Grandi, Jérôme Lang & César A. Hidalgo 

Nature Human Behaviour (2023)

Digital technologies can augment civic participation by facilitating the expression of detailed political preferences. Yet, digital participation efforts often rely on methods optimized for elections involving a few candidates. Here we present data collected in an online experiment where participants built personalized government programmes by combining policies proposed by the candidates of the 2022 French and Brazilian presidential elections. We use this data to explore aggregates complementing those used in social choice theory, finding that a metric of divisiveness, which is uncorrelated with traditional aggregation functions, can identify polarizing proposals. These metrics provide a score for the divisiveness of each proposal that can be estimated in the absence of data on the demographic characteristics of participants and that explains the issues that divide a population. These findings suggest that divisiveness metrics can be useful complements to traditional aggregation functions in direct forms of digital participation.

Read the full article at: www.nature.com

The clinical trials puzzle: How network effects limit drug discovery

KISHORE VASAN, DEISY MORSELLI GYSI, ALBERT-LÁSZLÓ BARABÁSI

iScience 26, 108361

The depth of knowledge offered by post-genomic medicine has carried the promise of new drugs, and cures for multiple diseases. To explore the degree to which this capability has materialized, we extract meta-data from 356,403 clinical trials spanning four decades, aiming to offer mechanistic insights into the innovation practices in drug discovery. We find that convention dominates over innovation, as over 96% of the recorded trials focus on previously tested drug targets, and the tested drugs target only 12% of the human interactome. If current patterns persist, it would take 170 years to target all druggable proteins. We uncover two network-based fundamental mechanisms that currently limit target discovery: preferential attachment, leading to the repeated exploration of previously targeted proteins; and local network effects, limiting exploration to proteins interacting with highly explored proteins. We build on these insights to develop a quantitative network-based model to enhance drug discovery in clinical trials.

Read the full article at: www.cell.com