Month: August 2019

How Much Would You Pay to Change a Game before Playing It?

Envelope theorems provide a differential framework for determining how much a rational decision maker (DM) is willing to pay to alter the parameters of a strategic scenario. We generalize this framework to the case of a boundedly rational DM and arbitrary solution concepts. We focus on comparing and contrasting the case where DM’s decision to pay to change the parameters is observed by all other players against the case where DM’s decision is private information. We decompose DM’s willingness to pay a given amount into a sum of three factors: (1) the direct effect a parameter change would have on DM’s payoffs in the future strategic scenario, holding strategies of all players constant; (2) the effect due to DM changing its strategy as they react to a change in the game parameters, with the strategies of the other players in that scenario held constant; and (3) the effect there would be due to other players reacting to a the change in the game parameters (could they observe them), with the strategy of DM held constant. We illustrate these results with the quantal response equilibrium and the matching pennies game and discuss how the willingness to pay captures DM’s anticipation of their future irrationality.

 

How Much Would You Pay to Change a Game before Playing It?
David Wolpert and Justin Grana

Entropy 2019, 21(7), 686

Source: www.mdpi.com

Connecting empirical phenomena and theoretical models of biological coordination across scales

Coordination in living systems—from cells to people—must be understood at multiple levels of description. Analyses and modelling of empirically observed patterns of biological coordination often focus either on ensemble-level statistics in large-scale systems with many components, or on detailed dynamics in small-scale systems with few components. The two approaches have proceeded largely independent of each other. To bridge this gap between levels and scales, we have recently conducted a human experiment of mid-scale social coordination specifically designed to reveal coordination at multiple levels (ensemble, subgroups and dyads) simultaneously. Based on this experiment, the present work shows that, surprisingly, a single system of equations captures key observations at all relevant levels. It also connects empirically validated models of large- and small-scale biological coordination—the Kuramoto and extended Haken–Kelso–Bunz (HKB) models—and the hallmark phenomena that each is known to capture. For example, it exhibits both multistability and metastability observed in small-scale empirical research (via the second-order coupling and symmetry breaking in extended HKB) and the growth of biological complexity as a function of scale (via the scalability of the Kuramoto model). Only by incorporating both of these features simultaneously can we reproduce the essential coordination behaviour observed in our experiment.

 

Connecting empirical phenomena and theoretical models of biological coordination across scales
Mengsen Zhang , Christopher Beetle , J. A. Scott Kelso and Emmanuelle Tognoli

JRS Interface

Source: royalsocietypublishing.org

PHD/Postdoc Openings at Cross Labs

OUR MISSION
Cross Labs’ mission is to bridge between intelligence science and AI technology at the service of human society. At Cross Labs, we focus on pushing fundamental research towards a thorough mathematical understanding of all intelligent processes observable both in nature and in artificial environments.

POSITION
To reach our goals, we are seeking ambitious, highly-skilled researchers to solve open problems on both natural and artificial intelligence fronts. Our current research priorities cover a large range of intelligence science topics, including artificial life, cognitive neuroscience, collective intelligence, deep learning, robotics, and computational linguistics. Other research topics will be seriously considered if you can make a case for their tractability and relevance to intelligence science research as envisioned by Cross Labs.

IDEAL PROFILE
The ideal candidate shares our excitement to understand the fundamental principles of intelligence, has a career interest in our core research questions and aims to eventually develop into a senior research fellow at Cross Labs, or continue these avenues of research at another institution after completing substantial work at Cross Labs.

Source: www.crosslabs.org