[ Your Name ] would like to inform you about this article on Complexity Digest 2011.24 - 03 http://comdig.unam.mx/index.php?id_issue=2011.24#35239 2011/12/09 [ Your Message ] Editor-in-Chief: Carlos Gershenson Founding Editor: Gottfried Mayer Webcast Archive relaunched: comdig.unam.mx/webcasts/ What Are Leaders Really For?, HBR Blog Network Excerpt: By refusing to name a leader, Occupy Wall Street presents a challenge to this view. With no one figure to credit or blame, with no face to put on a sprawling inchoate movement, and with no hierarchy of power, we simply don't know how to process what "it" is, and therefore how to think about it. And because this absence of a familiar personality-centric narrative makes us uncomfortable, we are tempted to reject the whole thing as somehow not real. Or instead, we insist that in order to be taken seriously, the movement must first change to reflect what we expect from serious organizations â€" namely a charismatic leader to whom we can attribute everything. Source: What Are Leaders Really For?[ http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/11/what_are_leaders_really_for.html#.TtEXVNOGo8I.twitter ], Duncan Watts, HBR Blog Network, 2011/11/21 You can discuss this article on Articles Forum http://comdig.unam.mx/topic.php?id_article=35239